I use the opportunity
you have provided me today to share some thoughts on Afghanistan.
In 2002, there was a strong international consensus and commitment
that the rebuilding and reconstruction of Afghanistan must continue
apace with a stabilization of the security situation. The Bonn,
Tokyo and Berlin conferences, the Regional Economic Cooperation
Conference (RECC) on Afghanistan in New Delhi, the successful
completion of Presidential and Parliamentary elections- all these
are prominent landmarks of the gains so far. But the challenges
remain, indeed they have grown and the resurgence of the Taliban has
set the entire process on precarious ground.
The increase in suicide attacks, kidnappings and most of all the
growing strength of the Taliban through Afghanistan’s south make us
now confront a problem which has acquired threatening proportions
and which calls for a well thought our counter strategy. An oft
repeated truism stares us in the face; if we forget history, we will
be condemned to repeat it. The international community must do all
that it can to prevent the reenactment of the ghastly dance of death
of the past.
The area of
instability now covers both sides of the Durand Line. It radiates
and projects its influence in all areas west of the Indus. Early
warning signs of this happening were perhaps ignored. We now face a
situation where in a large swathe of Southern Afghanistan,
international development activity has slowed down to the point of
being non-existent.
Afghanistan’s concerns at the incidence of cross border infiltration
have been accompanied by serious clashes between the border guards
of Afghanistan and Pakistan. The arc of instability is spreading.
The international community must stand united with the Afghan people
and reassure them that we intend to stay the course. As a victim of
the evil of terrorism, we knew that the fight against global
terrorism was never going to be an easy one. We cannot allow out
enthusiasm to wane or improvise solutions by way of compromises –
whether with the Taliban or with others. We are dealing with a
globally and regionally interconnected alliance of terrorist groups.
The Al Qaeda the Taliban feed off each other, nourish and protect
each other and actively cooperate in carrying out attacks against
their enemies – which includes most of us present here today!
Appeasement will only embolden them and they will use every
concession to undermine, cripple and destroy the very base of the
democratic and plural structure that the international community
seeks to build there.
What can we do? We
have to be determined to stay the course and deal with the security
challenge as well as the developmental effort. The gap between
pledged contributions and actual inflows must be bridged.
Developmental activity cannot be allowed to suffer. India on its
part will do what it can. We have a large and ambitious assistance
programme in place, ranging from roads and hydroelectricity to small
developmental projects, education and training. Much more needs to
be done. But developmental efforts have to be simultaneously
accompanied by action on the security front. On our part, we are
ready to work together with Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the
international community towards this end.
On Iran
Throughout history, Iran has radiated through Persian language and
culture its influence over all its neighbouring countries. In Iran,
therefore, we deal with not just a political entity but also a
cultural force that takes great pride in its civilizational
achievements. I think it is worth reiterating this to ourselves when
we deal with that country on difficult issues such as security,
non-proliferation, etc. In our view, Iran must be engaged
purposefully and candidly - not by demonising its social and
cultural mores but by recognizing their internal dynamic even while
we may not accept them for ourselves. For those of us who inhabit
the same region as Iran and are aware of the richness of its history
and culture, and the pride they take in their civilization, it is
axiomatic that threats against or denigration of the country will
not work.
Iran has to mindful of its international obligations, but progress
on the issues that concern us will not be possible by the use or the
threat of use of force or sanctions. It is only engagement which
will enable us to see that Iran views following its international
obligations as being in its pragmatic self interest. It is a country
of tremendous natural and human resources and the development of
these resources will make Iran a factor for regional security. The
threat or the implied threat of use of military or economic force
will not.
Back